— File No. NV/2026/001 —

In Chamber Use

NyayaVedika

Case law, ratio, and the first draft of the pleading

In the matter of

A working advocate's reference to Indian case law,

and a tool to draft the first pleading from it.

— Anantapur Bar Association, Andhra Pradesh —

Heard beforeAdv. S. Nagendra Naik, B.A., LL.B.
Naga Law Chambers, Anantapur

— In chamber —

ForThe lawyers and clerks of the Anantapur and Telugu-state Bars

In English, Telugu, or both

For example —

  • 01.Anticipatory bail — 498A cruelty — how recent must the FIR be?
  • 02.Adangal shows my father as owner; can I get mutation without a registered will?
  • 03.EC says no encumbrance but bank says loan on plot — what do I do?
  • 04.Notice u/s 80 CPC before suit on a promissory note — required?
  • 05.Partition among brothers — one refuses to sign, can I file alone?
Filed · Awaiting Citation

§2.

What NyayaVedika does,
in the order a lawyer does it.

There is no workflow chart here. The tool is built around what actually happens in chamber on a Tuesday morning.

1.

The issue is stated.

You describe the matter in plain English, Telugu, or the language the FIR is in. The tool does not require structured input. The way you would explain it to a senior is what it takes.

2.

Citations are returned.

You get a numbered list of judgments with the case name, citation, court, and the ratio decidendi pulled out verbatim. Not a summary. Not a paraphrase. The text the judge wrote, with the case number and year.

3.

A first draft is filed.

Choose the pleading type — bail, partition, consumer, revenue mutation, notice. The tool produces a structured first draft, with the parties, facts, grounds, and prayer already laid out. You edit, you do not start from blank.


§3.

What a citation looks like
when you ask about a 498A arrest.

Three judgments, in the order the tool ranks them by relevance to your question. Each is rendered as a citation, not a card.

Citation No. 1 of 3

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar

Ratio:Where the allegation is mechanical, the omnibus allegations in the FIR do not justify automatic arrest. The investigating officer is duty-bound to satisfy herself that the allegations in the FIR make out a cognizable offence.

[(2024) 4 SCC 312] · AIR 2014 SC 2756

Citation No. 2 of 3

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

K. Ramana v. The Tahsildar, Anantapur

Ratio:Where the Adangal and Pahani records disclose continuous possession for more than thirty years, the presumption of title in favour of the recorded owner is rebuttable only by documentary evidence, not by oral assertions of the rival claimant.

[2023 SCC OnLine AP 4891] · MANU/AP/1289/2023

Citation No. 3 of 3

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

V. Srinivas v. State of Telangana

Ratio:The Encumbrance Certificate is a snapshot of registered transactions only; an entry in the bank records of a charge over an unpartitioned family plot does not appear on the EC until a final decree of partition.

[2022 SCC OnLine TS 1847] · MANU/TS/0421/2022

— The full judgment text and any connected case law is available from the citation screen. Footnote markers link to SCC Online, Indian Kanoon, and the e-Courts portal.


§4.

The advocate who built it,
and the work it gets used for.

I amS. Nagendra Naik, advocate practising at the Anantapur Bar, Andhra Pradesh, since 2011. I file at the District Court, the Sessions Court, the AP High Court, the Telangana High Court, and the Revenue Divisional Officer. Most of my work is in revenue and land, family partition, and bail.

I builtNyayaVedika for myself, because I needed the citation to come back with the ratio decidendi already in it, and I needed the first draft of the pleading to be in the format the registry accepts. The tool does not replace the advocate. It removes the two hours before the file is ready.

I share itwith other lawyers in the Anantapur and Telugu-state Bars. The Telegram bot at @nagalawchambers_bot is the same tool, on the phone.

In Good Standing · AP Bar Council
Naga Law Chambers →

§5.

The documents it drafts,
for the courts we actually appear in.

These are not "templates". Each one is built around the format the registry of the court accepts. You change the names, the facts, the dates, and the prayer. The structure is fixed.

01

Anticipatory bail — 438 CrPC

For

Sessions Court

What it covers

Bail application with grounds of arrest apprehension, prior antecedents, and the Arnesh Kumar compliance certificate.

02

Partition suit — Hindu Succession

For

District Court

What it covers

Plaint with family tree schedule, prayer for mesne profits, and the share-allocation computation.

03

Consumer complaint — deficiency in service

For

District Consumer Forum

What it covers

Complaint with chronology of deficiency, the Opposite Party particulars, and the relief sought under Section 35.

04

Revenue mutation — legal heir record

For

Tahsildar

What it covers

Application under the AP Revenue Code, with succession certificate and possession evidence schedule.

05

Notice u/s 80 CPC — money recovery

For

Pre-suit

What it covers

Statutory notice with cause of action, demand particulars, and 30-day compliance window.

06

Written statement — civil suit

For

District Court

What it covers

Para-wise reply, preliminary objections, and the counter-claim with the Limitation Act statement.


§6.

Where the work gets done.

The tool is not a general-purpose legal assistant. It is tuned to the work that comes across the desk in Anantapur.

Revenue and land

Adangal, Pahani, EC, NOC, mutation, and the AP Revenue Code.

Bail and criminal

Anticipatory bail (438 CrPC), regular bail, quashing petitions, 498A, NDPS.

Family and partition

Hindu Succession Act 1956, partition suits, succession certificates.

Civil and contract

Money recovery, written statements, summary suits, Section 80 CPC notices.

Consumer forums

District, State, and NCDRC complaints; deficiency in service and product.

Service matters

AP and TS service rules, promotion disputes, disciplinary proceedings.


§7.

To consult.

In personNaga Law Chambers
Door No. 12-3-218, Subash Road,
Anantapur — 515001

On Telegram@nagalawchambers_bot — the same tool, on the phone.

For chamber mattersUse the Telegram bot for case queries, citations, and draft requests. For consultation, the chambers line is open Mon–Sat, 10:00 – 18:00 IST.

sd/- Adv. S. Nagendra Naik

Signed in chamber, Anantapur